First-time novelist: coincidence or synchronicity?

Last night I was teaching a class to a group of first-time novelists. One of the students read the outline of her first act. It was compelling and filled with vivid, dynamic characters. And then there was a moment when an incident happened that made things easy for the hero.

We discussed the fact that readers tend to lose interest when coincidence leans in the protagonist’s favor. This is because it is only through conflict that character is revealed, and coincidence or convenience does not indicate meaning.

A second student brought up the point that there is a difference between coincidence and synchronicity. Synchronicity is all about meaning. Synchronicity speaks to the underlying meaning of what we’re attempting to express.

For example: if a character who is trying to get to Chicago for a wedding gets dumped off on a deserted road in the middle of the night, and is picked up by the best man who just happens to be driving this road, that is coincidence.

However:

If a character is hitch-hiking on a deserted highway in the middle of the night, and is picked up by the husband of the woman he is having an affair with…that is synchronicity.

The only difference is conflict.

Posted in First-Time Novelist, Writing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

First-Time Novelist: Did You Write Today?

When I work with first-time novelists, the first question that I usually ask is, “Did you write today?”

First-time novelists often have all sorts of ideas of where they’re struggling with their story, but none of these issues are relevant of they are not continuing to write each day.

Everything we write either belongs or is leading us to what ultimately belongs in our story.

Regardless of its quality, our writing is the fuel that dispels our confusion and gets us to the end of our first novel.

Posted in First-Time Novelist | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

First-time novelist: Why is this day unlike any other?

The 90-Day novelists just began writing their first drafts this week. Many of these writers are first-time novelists. This is virgin territory for many of them, and it is both thrilling and terrifying. They have rough outlines, a general sense of the direction that their story may take, but we all know that outlines are rules made to be broken.

One thing we know is that virtually every story begins with the question: “Why is this day unlike any other?” This question is probably not answered on page one, but from the very beginning, the first-time novelist is moving inexorably to this moment.

The Inciting Incident provides the story with context, but only as a result of the meaning that the first-time novelist ascribes to this event.

The Inciting Incident is being set up from the very beginning.

It’s important for the first-time novelist to recognize that his/her story begins with tension. Something is happening, a struggle of some sort, and this tension grows and leads to the “why is this day unlike any other” moment.

Every word is in service to providing the Inciting Incident with context. By the time we reach this moment, our reader understands why the story is being told.

In Alice Sebold’s The Lovely Bones the Inciting Incident occurs when the narrator, Susie Salmon, is murdered. Her death, in and of itself, does not provide the story with context. It is her relationship to her family and her desire to remain with them that connects us to her dilemma – the struggle to hold on to her family while needing to let go.

It is not just first-time novelists that struggle with the Inciting Incident. Every writer does. Be curious not simply about what happens, but also why it is happening, and look for ways to put your characters into action so that we understand them.

If you simply tell us what the characters are thinking and feeling, we won’t care, and we won’t necessarily even believe you. But if you show us through action, we will be invested in the outcome.

Posted in First-Time Novelist, Novel | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

First-time novelist: The only safe place is on the page

Today the 90-Day Novel in-person workshoppers begin writing their first drafts. Many of them are first-time novelists. They are excited and terrified. Here are some of their thoughts.

What have I signed up for? What is going to happen when I begin setting words down on the page? What will I discover about myself? Am I really a first-time novelist, or am I a fraud?

When your brain starts churning, and you can’t turn it off, here’s a solution:

Stop trying.

Notice that your first-time novelist mind is going bat-shit crazy because that’s what happens when we do anything for the first time. You can’t stop your mind with your mind. Every writer (not just the first-time novelist) goes through this.

Get a cup of coffee and start writing.

Until you put your pen on the page, the voices are going to try to convince you that this is a terrible mistake. Once you start moving your pen, you’ll lose yourself in the story, and you’ll be well on your way to becoming a first-time novelist.

Posted in First-Time Novelist, Writing | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

First-time novelist: Once Upon a Time

Fairy tales begins with Once Upon a Time. Those four words are an invitation to lose ourselves in a world of make-believe. For first-time novelists, it’s important to understand that on some level, Once Upon a Time is the unspoken beginning of every story. It’s a way of saying to our reader, “Come close, I have a story to tell you.”

Many first-time novelists mistake the experience of reading a novel with the experience of writing one. Just because a good novel “starts slow” or feels languid, does not mean that the author isn’t introducing tension immediately, and actively setting up the story from the very beginning.

When a first-time novelist explains to me that a scene exists in his novel “to set up these characters…” that’s not a good enough reason. Of course we want to ‘set up’ our characters, but the scene has many layers to it as well. If all that happens in a scene is what happens, there is no subtext.

First-time novelists often mistake a languid storytelling style with a lack of narrative drive. If you want your reader to keep reading, it’s important to introduce tension from the beginning and find ways to build that tension through to the last page. The tension can be subtle, but it must be on the page.

Posted in Fiction, First-Time Novelist | Tagged , | Leave a comment

First-time novelist: Is the three-act structure a formula?

Recently I was working with a first-time novelist who was planning to write her novel in terms of five acts, ie: Shakespeare, Jane Eyre, etc., and was concerned that it would not ‘fit’ into a three-act structure.

The three-act structure does not mitigate the possibility of a story being divided into a series of parts. I think the reason so many first-time novelists resist the idea of a three-act structure, is because they rightfully fear limiting their creativity. In fact, the opposite is true, and when one understands the purpose of structure, which I believe is to hold our ideas accountable to universal truths, we discover that anything we imagine can be contained by structure if we’re willing to distill our ideas to their nature.

I don’t believe that working with three-act structure is limiting, but I do think it demands that we be rigorous with our ideas. Working with structure helps the first-time novelist to remove his thumb from the scale, and in doing so, the paradox is that his story has an opportunity to become more dynamic.

In fact, what’s so thrilling about working with story structure is that it invites our imagination to stretch. When we read a well-told story and wonder “How did they come up with that?” the answer is probably that they didn’t, but that through a practice of working with structure, they made themselves available to a process that invited up images and ideas that led them to places they might not have otherwise ventured.

Structure allows the first-time novelist to see his story from a variety of perspectives. For instance, he may discover that a scene he’s imagined does no belong in his story, but if he inquires into the nature of what he’s attempting to express, he may discover that what was essential in the scene finds its way into the work in a way that deepens or reinforces what he’s attempting to express.

The three-act-structure is misunderstood by many first-time novelists because it is so often taught by story analysts whose real gifts often lie in left-brain deconstruction of an existing work. In deconstructing a piece of writing, we’re usually left looking at the parts of the system (the plot) while missing the more ineffable qualities (the exploration of the theme), which is why writers often confuse structure with plotting.

In fact, structure is a way to connect to the underlying forces at work in our story. The plot arises from this place.

The three-act structure is an intrinsic aspect of life, whether it’s birth, life, death, or morning, noon, and night, or the dissemination of any fundamental human experience, from relationships, to achieving a goal (setting the goal, struggling to accomplish it, and finally the achievement), and within these parameters, a whole host of events may transpire. Don’t confuse the parts of the journey (the plot) with the essential stages in the hero’s journey, which is the theme.

Posted in First-Time Novelist, Writing | Tagged , | Leave a comment

First-time writer: Feedback

I attended a reading this afternoon for a series of first-time writers. The work was surprisingly good. Almost every writer had a unique voice, a sense of humor, and a specific take on the world.

I was told that the writing instructor does not applaud the writing. She doesn’t rate it, or tell the first-time writer that he or she is wonderful.

Instead, she asks the writer simple, objective questions. “Did you say what you set out to say?” “Is there anything that you feel is missing?” And she asks the rest of the class, “Is there anything that you wanted to hear more of?”

The focus is never on ego gratification. It is always on the work; how can you make the writing as specific and dynamic as possible.

We are largely powerless over how our work is received by the public. Oftentimes sub-rate work is celebrated, while deep, probing work is ignored. Quality is somewhat subjective, and rarely a sign of a first-time writer’s potential popularity.

The only thing we can truly control is our dedication to our story. Is it as clear and specific as we can make it? Have we said everything we set out to say?

If we have fulfilled these two criteria, it is time for the first-time writer to send it out into the world, and to continue building a body of work.

Posted in First-Time Novelist, Writing | Tagged , | Leave a comment

First-time novelist: why do you write?

I remember when I fell in love with stories. In the fifth grade, my teacher, Mr. Lall, introduced our class to the book club. My mother allowed me to buy a maximum of three novels a month.

I pored over my options. I could rarely decide on just three, so my mother usually let me buy a fourth.

One of the first novels I read was Mary Higgins Clark’s novel about a busload of grade-school students that gets hijacked and the children are taken hostage.

I was completely terrified. It was so real. (I didn’t realize until later that it was a true story, and had recently happened in California.)

I trembled with excitement. I couldn’t put the book down. I was stunned that someone’s words could have such an effect.

I wanted to do it. I wanted to become a first-time novelist, and a year later, my teacher, Mr. Bell-Smith, had our class write a novel of our own. I wrote a five-chapter story called SHIPWRECKED! (I added the exclamation mark while writing the second chapter – the damn thing had earned it.)

I was developing a relationship with my imagination. It could take me to places I had never been before. It could invent exotic characters and situations that were utterly new to me. In fact, over the next few years, as my desire grew, I began to wonder if my imagination could give me a career, and a life.

I knew I wanted to create stories, even as I made a side trip into acting for a couple of years. For me, there was no greater thrill than losing myself completely in my imagination.

The day I knew I was going to be a writer for the rest of my life was bittersweet. I had been writing seriously for ten years and had not sold a single thing. It dawned on me that perhaps I never would.

Strangely, the pain of this realization transmuted into a sense of relief. The pressure was off, and I suddenly realized that in the most subtle way, I had been writing what I believed others wanted to read.

In that moment, I gave myself permission to write a story just for me. It would be thrilling, wry, dark, and heartbreaking all at once. I would explore areas that I dared never tell anyone about in my civilian life. And perhaps I would not even show it to anyone.

As I wrote it, I blushed with delight at how revealing I was giving myself permission to be, set loose from the idea that if you don’t sell your work you are a loser. I had accepted my loserdom status, and I was free.

I wrote the first draft quickly, in just around 90 days, in fact, and when I was done, I took the risk of showing my first novel to a friend. She liked it, and gave me some excellent notes. I did a quick rewrite, and she encouraged me to send it out.

It was the first piece of work I sold, and it was the birth of another first-time novelist.

Tell me your story. Why do you write?

Posted in First-Time Novelist, Writing | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

First-time novelist: Am I a Writer?

“Do you think I’m a writer?”

I’m asked this question frequently by first-time novelists.

If you’re putting words on the page, you are writing. No first-time novelists ask if they are eaters, or breathers.

I do understand what’s behind the question. They are really asking, “Do you think my writing is good enough to get published, or do you think I’m just wasting my time?”

The problem with this question is that the -first-time novelist misses the point of writing. The desire to write is connected to the desire to evolve. Self-expression is our birthright. The simple act of putting words on a page each day can have a transformative effect on our perceptions of ourselves and the world.

By shifting our approach to ‘why’ we write our novel, our writing can shift. We can become looser, more honest on the page, we can become willing to surprise ourselves and to move in directions that we might not have allowed ourselves when we were attempting to be good first-time novelists.

Posted in First-Time Novelist, Writing | Tagged , | Leave a comment

First-time novelist: Predicting the market

You can’t predict the market. The moment you hear that the market wants love stories, it’s too late.

By the time the first-time novelist has written what the market is supposedly seeking, the market has moved on.

Think like the fashion designers. Every fall, they roll out a whole series of wild new ideas. Don’t follow the market, create it.

First-time novelist John Grisham didn’t become a lawyer, because he knew that one day books about lawyers were going to sell.

I doubt first-time novelist Stephen King conducted market analysis surveys before he decided to write Carrie.

Whether first-time novelist Candace Bushnell was consciously aware that “sex sells” and went about writing her “Sex and the City” novels is doubtful. More likely, she simple wrote what turned her on.

You’ve heard this canard a million times. It hasn’t changed, and it never will.

Write what turns you on.

Posted in First-Time Novelist, Getting Published, Publishing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment