One of the challenges of good storytelling is knowing when to reveal information. It is through trial and error that we discover what works best. Removing or reordering a scene can greatly alter the story’s meaning. For example, by withholding crucial information we may create an atmosphere of suspense, yet this choice can also affect how our reader understands the story.
In the rewrite we do not want to lose touch with our ideal reader. Story is a dialogue between the author, and that reader whose questions we intuitively anticipate by constantly asking ourselves, “Am I revealing character through behavior and action, or am I relying on telling the reader who the characters are?”
Telling something about a character without demonstrating it through behavior will engender suspicion in our reader. I remember, years ago, when I first moved to New York, I had a roommate who was a prodigious blind-dater. She would come home and regale me with her stories. Once she had a lunch date with some guy who midway through the meal reached across the table, took her hand and said, “I just want you to know that you can trust me.” She high-tailed it out of there.
As writers, we do not want to be that guy. It is presumptuous to assume that our reader should trust our opinion on anything. We do not want to bury some political screed in our dialogue, or bully our reader into seeing things our way. A story is a pact, and we must hold up our end of the deal. As the writer, we have agreed to simply present the world and allow the reader to have his own experience.
